-
Posts
0 -
Joined
Reputation
1 owes Virgo a rune setAbout Pope
-
Surprised you haven't opened fire into a crowd yet tbh
-
Grats @sheli~
-
If I have to go beforehand, I'll use the toilet. But if I suddenly have to pee while in there, I'll do it. I don't see why not.
-
I'll sign up as long as people doing it actually pay attention to it etc.
-
Hey
-
VR is still open?
-
If you want to eat spaghetti at 11am just say so
-
The Ninth Circuit presumed that because Congress defined “maintain” to include “maintain” and “collect,” Congress intended the provision to apply to distinct activities. Id. at 1295. For an agency to “maintain” a record describing how an individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment “pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity,” the Ninth Circuit found that, “to give each of these verbs its meaning,” the most reasonable reading of the statute as a whole is that the record must be pertinent to an authorized law enforcement activity both “at the time of gathering, i.e., collecting, [and] at the time of keeping, i.e., maintaining.” Id. at 1295 (quoting J. Roderick MacArthur Found. v. FBI, 102 F.3d 600, 607 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (Tatel, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)). See also, e.g., Albright v. United States, 631 F.2d 915, 918-20 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (analyzing scope of term “maintain” in context of subsection (e)(7) challenge to record describing First Amendment-protected activity and stating that “the Act clearly prohibits even the mere collection of such a record, independent of the agency’s maintenance, use or dissemination of it thereafter”).
-
I'm not allowed to order any food from delivery food apps because of an incident regarding a mcdonald's monopoly piece. Lots of legal trouble for that one.
-
Summer is atrocious. I can't enjoy anything when I'm drenched in sweat. Worst feeling.