Jebrim AMA

[Jebrim 99]

1 minute ago, Joe said:

 

Why do you think that is? 

Because only progressives would waste their time choosing such an unproductive career path. The rest of us are actually out there working real jobs that add real value to society.

[Joe 254]

Just now, Jebrim said:

Because only progressives would waste their time choosing such an unproductive career path. The rest of us are actually out there working real jobs that add real value to society.

Do Economics, Law, Journalism not add "real" value to society either? 

[Jebrim 99]

3 hours ago, Blogs said:

 

1. Have you talked to your vetting officer about this? What do you think about holding a federal security clearance when you hate the US government?

 

2. Could you please tell me what are American values? Conservatism is not inherently American. What America calls 'conservative' is not actually conservative. It is a religion fuelled movement that believes in limiting people's individual liberty so they follow the laws set by those in power. Remarkably similar to the Taliban, one might suggest. Recognising it's a lEfT wInG cOmMuNiSt MiNdWaRpInG pRoPaGaNdA TV show, please watch:

 

 

 

The Republican Party is no longer a conservative party. Gingrich started it, the Tea Party digitalised it and Donald Trump finished it. Donald Trump's party will be the downfall of America and will be remembered as such.

 

I would be interested to know what you think the core tenants of conservatism are, and then how the Republican Party of 2021 stands for them. And please do so without reference to the Democrats. I am a socially liberal conservative, because I do not believe it is the government's place to regulate individual citizens unless it is necessary to protect security. Do you think dudes fucking other dudes or immigrants are threatening?

 

Main issue with your response is that you didn't answer my question on the MyPillow guy?

You are not a conservative. You are a libertarian or moderate that is attempting to hijack the conservative label. The national Republican Party is also not conservative, although the Republican Party of Texas is.

 

Conservatism is about conserving the traditional way of doing things. What it means varies depending on the historical context of each society. Conservatism would mean something very different in Italy than it would mean in America. American's history is different.

 

What are traditional American values? Every state in early America had sodomy illegal. LGBT values are not conservative. Those are progressive. Below is an example of the laws in Virginia, as pushed for by Thomas Jefferson. Castration was the punishment for both sodomy and rape.

 

Not a single place in the entire world had ever accepted same-sex marriage as a concept until the Netherlands did in 2001. That's how recent this is. In fact, if you were a true constitutionalist, you would oppose the way it was forcibly legalized across the nation in America against the will of the people of the states. It shouldn't even matter whether you favor same-sex marriage or not, you should oppose the way that the Supreme Court unconstitutionally legislated from the bench and overrode all state constitutions and statutes on the matter. What they did was wrong.

 

I couldn't care less about some random pillow dude.

Edited May 14, 2021 by Jebrim

[Req 228]

Were you worried about your career choice when Covid significantly impacted the commercial airlines side of aerospace and defense industry?

 

How much do you earn a year?  Any bonus?

 

What is your dream job?

[eggshell24 29]

3 hours ago, Adam_ said:

Is it possible for sexual assault to take place between married couples?

 

 

he's prolly afraid his honest answer to this could get him banned from rs lol, after what happened to oslo

[Killaz 60]

2 hours ago, Jebrim said:

I would not have supported a constitutional amendment requiring all states to have the same voting policy. Also, contrary to the bad history we are taught, it's not actually true that it was impossible for women to vote even before the amendment.

 

There were also free blacks that owned property. There were even black slaveowners.

The overwhelming majority of historians (90%+) are also progressives. There are 33.5 Democrats for every Republican in History departments.

 

 

thats not what I asked so I'll ask again

 

 

Quote

if you think the old days are the way, then do you believe women have the right to vote? what about independence of women? do you think women should be able to own property? Also, do you believe any non-white person should be allowed to own property given that was not a thing back then?

•  

 

Just because it was uncommon does not mean it was popular to do. Women had to fight for civil rights and so did minorities, so no, it was not common as you're making it out to be. What I'm asking is DO YOU believe they should have the rights given they did not back at that time. A few might have had the privilege's, but not the same RIGHT as a white male. 

 

 

 

to add, lets just say do you want muslim people voting in the same elections as you or do you think they should have the privilege to? YOUR OPINION.

Edited May 14, 2021 by Killaz

[Jebrim 99]

20 minutes ago, Killaz said:

 

thats not what I asked so I'll ask again

 

 

 

Just because it was uncommon does not mean it was popular to do. Women had to fight for civil rights and so did minorities, so no, it was not common as you're making it out to be. What I'm asking is DO YOU believe they should have the rights given they did not back at that time. A few might have had the privilege's, but not the same RIGHT as a white male. 

 

 

 

to add, lets just say do you want muslim people voting in the same elections as you or do you think they should have the privilege to? YOUR OPINION.

I would restrict voting rights to property owners, not white male status. Poor white males shouldn’t be able to vote. 

[Carolina 728]

Have you enjoyed doing this AMA?

 

Would you consider possibly joining the community discord or maybe even joining the clan down the line? 🙂 

[Killaz 60]

7 minutes ago, Jebrim said:

I would restrict voting rights to property owners, not white male status. Poor white males shouldn’t be able to vote. 

so no women and no minorities like Muslims

 

got it 

 

 

in other words you think "fuck you I got mine" voting should happen

Edited May 14, 2021 by Killaz

[Dickus 779]

7 minutes ago, Jebrim said:

I would restrict voting rights to property owners, not white male status. Poor white males shouldn’t be able to vote. 

What if the poors have good Christian morals? 

[Jebrim 99]

15 minutes ago, Dickus said:

What if the poors have good Christian morals? 

If they can’t get their own financial house in order, they shouldn’t be having a say in how taxpayer money should be spent. In fact, they’re not even paying property taxes to begin with. They deserve no say.

Edited May 14, 2021 by Jebrim

[Jebrim 99]

31 minutes ago, Carolina said:

Have you enjoyed doing this AMA?

 

Would you consider possibly joining the community discord or maybe even joining the clan down the line? 🙂 

The Discord, yes. The clan, probably not. I don’t play RS anymore.

[Jebrim 99]

6 hours ago, alice said:

you mentioned earlier that you wouldn't have sex until marriage however would you look/appreciate nudes if they were sent to you or would you block them?

It is illegal in Texas to send unsolicited nude photos. I would not appreciate nudes being sent to my phone. It actually says something (negative) about a woman that would do such a thing. 

5 hours ago, Blogs said:

This is absurd. How far does that break down - what if Austin, Texas allowed murder? Would that be okay?

 

And in that regard you have no problem with states allowing late term abortion?

States are sovereign, not municipalities. Both local governments and the federal government get their authority from the states.

 

I very strongly oppose all abortion and find it evil. It is murder. That said, other states have the right to have laws I find to be evil just as much as we have the right to have laws they find to be evil. That’s the beauty of federalism. We don’t have to kill each other over it. 

[Josh 137]

So will you share your manifesto? I think it’s clear you have one. 
 

Why do you socially and culturally want to live in the 1700s, but happy to economically live in 21st century as you said you support a globalised economy. 
Why should the economy evolve but not legislation? 
 

 

Which outlawed forms of capital punishment would you like to see back?

 

Is breaking the law ever excusable if it’s in the name of religion?

[Jebrim 99]

6 hours ago, Blogs said:

Okay, let's break this down with a few questions. Apologies to all I'm only on page 22.

 

1. Do Iran or North Korea have the right to pursue nuclear weapons? Did Nazi Germany have the right to commit genocide? Did ISIL's Caliphate have the right to turn the Yazidis into sex slaves? From your logic they do, and we should do nothing about it.

2. A citizen having to "move with their feet" relies on each citizen having equal economic ability to do so. Do you actually believe in socialism?

3. According to the electoral college, a citizen in California matters less than a citizen in Wyoming. Do you agree with this?

1. They are enemies that have threatened us. For our own security, we cannot trust them. This is especially the case for Iran, which comes from a culture where suicide bombings runs rampant. Mutually Assured Destruction won’t work with them.

 

2. I believe in personal responsibility. Those who refuse to pull themselves up by their bootstraps will get no sympathies from me. The Articles of Confederation actually denied rights to paupers and vagabonds. That said, being poor doesn’t prevent one from traveling. The homeless manage to find their way to blue states just fine. All you need are the clothes on your back and a Greyhound ticket. I know because I’ve done it.

 

3. Yes. We are not a democracy. The federal government exists to represent the states, not the people directly. I don’t even support the general public voting for President. I’d rather see power return back to the state legislatures where they belong. Both the Senate and the Presidency were originally intended to be selected by the state legislatures, not by popular vote within the state.